Updated:
Economic relations, generative capacity, and the formation of value; a developing chapter series.
Conversions between forms of value, procedural ordering, and their implications for justice.
Social contracts, asymmetric generative capacity, and the conditions of effective alternatives.
Clarifying dialogue and theory of mind, problem formation, and the education of judgment.
Intervention, evidence-to-action, and distributed possibilities under critical-transition uncertainty.
Updated:
Ref NR/2026/02 — a formal, multilingual notice of resignation and change of affiliation, timestamped (OpenTimestamps) for independent verification. See Declarations & Notices.
Ref NR/2026/01 — a formal, multilingual notice of departure from the National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (NCNP), timestamped (OpenTimestamps) for verification. See Declarations & Notices.
A personal, unilateral and verifiable undertaking of permanent political neutrality, issued in multiple languages and timestamped (OpenTimestamps) for independent verification. See all declarations on the About page.
本文是对人类精神史的一次随想式思考，试图建立一个双重分类学框架。这一框架不仅描述了"是什么"(本体论层次)，更揭示了"如何生成"(生成性形态学层次)。通过这两个相互交织的维度，我们尝试理解从古代到现代，再到我们正在进入的新阶段的思想演进。这不是严格的学术研究，而是一次概念性的探索。 This essay is a casual reflection on the history of human spirit, attempting to establish a dual taxonomic framework.
Under the conjecture that "the universe is attempting to evolve in a manner that maximizes its generativity," justice, ethics, and morality assume distinct epistemological and dynamical statuses.
我们提出一种根植于基础物理学的激进自然化伦理学。核心猜想：宇宙展现出一种内在倾向，即最大化生成性（generativity）。此处的生成性指向持续探索配置空间与产生熵的能力。这种倾向通过量子振幅加权显现：在路径积分表述中，高生成性分支获得指数级更大的"实在权重"。 We propose a radical naturalization of ethics grounded in fundamental physics.
摘要 本文试图超越传统法理学中关于“正义是什么”的形而上追问，提出一种基于“关系性存在”的生成性法哲学观。通过整合后结构主义精神分析、东方道释智慧及马克思主义的批判视角，我们认为正义并非一个预先存在的实体，而是一种在法律的动态实践中被构筑的“在场性”。法律的符号秩序（“大他者”）如同渡河之舟，其终极目的并非自我永存，而是在实现正义的进程中导向自身的消解，从而使社会回归一种非异化的、本真的关系性和谐。 Abstract This essay seeks to move beyond the metaphysical question of “what is justice” and to pro
创造力，表面上似乎属于人类的能力范畴，是意志的展现、想象的产物、或认知机制的涌现。 然而，当我们追问创造的根基——创造为何可能？创造之前，何者在？ 我们会发现，“创造”本身并非源自个体的意志，而是源自更深层的存在之流。 Creation seems at first to belong to the sphere of human capacity—an act of will, imagination, or cognition.
The Lacanian theorization of the feminine constitutes a radical departure from essentialist or empirical descriptions, positing it instead as a singular structural position within the topology of the speaking being.
Difference seems closely related to generativity.
Traditional Western metaphysics begins with a fundamental question: "What is being?" and habitually answers with substance.
The gendered tendency toward relational versus competitive orientations may be understood through the psychoanalytic structure of subject formation.
Anthropological research reveals a thought-provoking possibility: human society may have originated from a matriarchal structure in which women once held higher status than men.